What crap wrote:
Don't know if your aware, but the opposite is true.

Less people the better.

eg, i'ld rather live in Australia in the 80's then 2010.

It was cleaner and safer, etc

I believe there are alot of people in power which want to depopulate the world.
eg, one child polices, forced sterilization, war, new viruses/diseases , dangerous vaccines, experimental GMO/GE foods.

Do you ever wonder why in the year 2010 there still is no cure to old, old! diseases eg cancer?

And why are we still dependent on old, old! fossil fuels?

In 2010? hmmm that's really interesting
Don't quite understand what you said. You like less people, you say there are politicians who want to depopulate the world by forced sterilisation, etc, and wars and the suppression of cures for diseases because there might be too many people? And the economic activity generated by wars and ill health is far more valuable than people?

Trouble is it is actually overpopulation that causes the wars and makes diseases spread faster so those depopulators using the traditional war and disease method are patently failing.

With the planet's population soaring towards 9billion we will probably accommodate another 9billion by wiping out all animal habitat and all nature reserves that supply our water and dropping the living standards for all but extremely rich in their fortresses, before anyone gets particularly worried. After all, when it gets hot, hungry and crowded the age old response of humans is fight (war) or flight (migrate to somewhere else).

What happens when we run out of somewhere elses?